A few years ago, one of the first comments I received on a
manuscript I submitted to an agent was “I don’t know where this takes place.” I
thought the descriptions were pretty clear. As far as I was concerned there is
only one ‘City’ — San Francisco. The agent thought I was writing about London
but she didn’t recognize my evocation.
Both cities are renown for fog and I had plenty of fog but
mine was rolling over Twin Peaks. Hers was rolling up the Thames. I had trolley
cars and BART. London has the Underground and double-decker buses. She wasn’t
seeing any of the landmarks of her City.
I didn’t want to go down the route of actually naming the
location – somehow that seemed a bit of a cheat, especially for this particular
book. I wanted the physical and sensual details to do the job but they didn’t,
at least not for this particular reader who had her own ideas about wharves,
wet tram lines and exhaust fumes.
So, how do you evoke a sense of place? If you name the town
or street, how do you ensure the person who reads those words has a real sense
of where you want them to imagine themselves to be? Is a sense of location that
important?
For some people, not being able to visualize a place is a
serious barrier to their enjoyment. They feel disoriented and excluded, alienated
– like being in a strange country without a map or knowing the language. Or worse, reading a poem written to
discombobulate.
If you are writing about a place unfamiliar to you but
critical to your story, how do you evoke that sense of authenticity your reader
will want?
Last year, I attended a conference in which one writer of
historical fiction praised satellite-generated images. While roaming streets of
towns and villages you’ve never visited can be a help, it’s of no use for time
periods that pre-date the technology. What
may have been rural, uninhabited terrain in the 19thC is more than likely urban
sprawl when that satellite passed by.
A sense of place is as much a character in fiction as protagonists
and just as unique to the experience of the reader as the author’s voice. When
I began to write Wait a Lonely Lifetime,
there was no doubt in my mind that the main body of the novel had to be in
Firenze (Florence), although I had only been there for three days several years
before I even had a notion to write this story. I had taken no photographs,
bought no postcards, collected no tourist guides. I had vague memories of restaurants,
piazzas and two obscure details that I knew I had to include.
Audacity was my guiding principle. As news readers are
taught: if you aren’t sure how to pronounce a name, give it your best shot with
authority.
Is location as important in fiction as it is in real estate?
When you read a novel, do you look for road signs?
4 comments:
Great post...when we say "the city" we are talking about Oklahoma City! I can see where the reader might get confused if they live elsewhere.
I think it helps a reader NOT to have to guess where they are and when the story takes place. I love it when historicals start with a date line because then I don't have to try to remember when Felipe II was king. Yes, I believe the details of time and place are important and evocative, I believe it helps the reader to know where they are. If I were to write about the Rialto Bulding, probably no one would know I'm talking about Kansas City. My suggestion: keep the wonderful descriptions but ground the reader.
I love to be taken away from my own place when reading a novel, so yes, a sense of place is essential - but I have to admit I also like to read the name. It can be misleading, though. I once read a historical book where SF was described as " a run-down village further down the coast" - that threw me!
I don't want to have to guess. I don't need to be told in the first paragraph, but if there's any doubt, I like to be told so I can relax and enjoy the rest of the story.
Post a Comment